By John Helmer in Moscow
To all junior miners, resource project developers, and investors in the risky wilds of Kazakhstan, be of good cheer — a Supreme Court judgement issued on December 11 in Sydney, Australia, has awarded the equivalent of US$11.4 million in compensation, penalties, and costs against a group of lawyers who have been found guilty of engaging in dishonest business practices.
Justice Clifford Einstein had ruled in October that the Kazakhstan-based law firm of Michael Wilson & Partners had been defrauded by three lawyers who had been employed by Wilson; and who had secretly moonlighted to earn fees and share bonuses for stock market listings and other transactions involving several major Kazakh resource projects — Sunkar Resources’s Chilisai phosphate project; Frontier Mining’s Benkala copper project; Roxi Petroleum; Max Petroleum; two other Central Asian mining projects, Urals Gold and Ablai; and four projects tied to these and other operators in the same region — Karamandybas (oil and gas), Ravninnoye (oil), Beibars Munai (oil), Lancaster, and Kangamiut (seafoods).
In his new order, NSW Justice Einstein reiterated his finding from October — “the essence of the matter is that the defendants concealed these continuing activities from the plainitiff”. Accordingly, the new judgement orders them to pay up what they gained unfairly in profit, and also compensate Wilson & Partners for the cost of having to litigate for recovery across the globe over the past three years. After itemizing invoices and share capital gains for each project transaction, the judge applied a 10% discount; rejected a claim for compensation for losses in the Benkala copper project; and dismissed a claim for additional and exemplary damages for the alleged conspiracy of the defendant lawyers against Wilson. Total, US$3.5 million, plus €555,259, plus A$4 million.
“The plaintiff has succeeded in almost every aspect of its pleaded case against the defendants”, Einstein ruled. “The usual rule as to costs, that they should follow the event, should apply” — another A$3.5 million. Grand total, US$11.4 million.
In his 216-page judgement issued on October 6, Einstein had ruled that John Emmott, Robert Nicholls, and David Slater had conspired together to exploit their positions in the Wilson lawfirm to breach their employment contracts and fiduciary duties by secretly creating a competing firm of their own, Temujin International, registered in the British Virgin Islands. Among the London AIM listed companies targeted by the scheme, the court papers identify Sunkar, Frontier, Roxi, and Max.
In a summary of his findings of fact, Einstein J said the conspiracy had begun in 2005, as soon as Slater had arrived at Wilson’s office in Kazakhstan from Australia, where he had been an in-house solicitor for the Westpac Banking Corporation. In a sequence of Almaty watering holes over several weeks, Slater and his co-conspirators created their cut-out company, calling it Temujin, which they borrowed from the history of the hero of the Mongol empire and the Kazakh steppes, Genghis Khan. Temujin was his original name. Slater left Wilson’s firm almost immediately afterwards, in December of 2005. Nicholls, formerly a Sydney barrister and partner at Freehills, followed in March of 2006; while Emmott, who had been with Wilson since 2001, stayed on to keep the flow of Wilson’s client business moving out the backdoor to Temujin. He exited on June 30, 2006. Temujin’s new business was to advise Wilson clients on the purchase of formerly state-owned oil, gas, gold and mineral companies and their listing on AIM.
In last week’s judgement, Einstein separates the defendants, and itemizes his rulings on culpability and financial liability for Slater, Nicholls, several companies of the Temujin group, and an associated Kazakh lawfirm. They are to pay up collectively. Emmott is named by the judge in both rulings as culpable, but he was not a defendant in the Sydney court. He is currently under investigation by the authorities in Switzerland and the UK.
Chilean chemical solutions firm Sinquiver is looking into marketing urine separation systems in Chile, the firm’s wastewater manager Alistair Marsh told BNamericas.
There are several advantages to the system, according to Marsh. “First of all, you don’t need freshwater to flush urine so you save on water use and costs,” he said.
The concept involves installing a different pipeline which would channel the urine to be stored in a tank. “Urine is a huge source of nitrogen and phosphate which could then be used for the production of fertilizer,” Marsh said.
“This kind of system would be especially useful in mining operations which involve a large number of people,” said Marsh, adding: “It would save water while simultaneously providing a source of fertilizer for local farmers.”
An additional benefit is that by taking the urine out of sewage, wastewater is easier to treat.
Urine accounts for less than 1% of wastewater but it contains about 80% of the nitrogen, 50% of the phosphate and 70% of the potassium, all of which must be removed. Nutrient removal is the most difficult aspect of wastewater treatment. By separating the urine at source, studies have shown energy savings of 25% at wastewater treatment plants.
“We are looking to offer urine-separating toilets to municipalities and companies that employ a large number of people such as malls and hotels, among others,” Marsh said.
“Wastewater treatment is still very new in Latin America but there is a great need for it and that is where we come in,” said Marsh, adding: “Sinquiver is looking for the best technology and solutions to introduce into the local market.”
In addition to wastewater treatment, the company provides solutions for the wood and paper industry, and sells industrial equipment.
Source: Greta Bourke, BNamericas.com [subscription site], 19 Nov 2009
discount mlb jerseys,
nhl jerseys
Introduction to the Gold Mining Process for Tabular Ore Bodies
There are a number of different methodologies used to conduct mining operations. One of these methods are discussed in this article.
The gold bearing ore is in situ in the reef band where it was deposited millions of years ago. It requiers drilled and blasted to free it from the country rock. According to Nell (1984:95) this process is called stoping. He defines stoping as:
the actual mining of ore by means of breaking ground in stopes to a size suitable for handling and processing for the recovery of the mineral content.
The breaking of the country rock includes drilling blast holes and blasting it. This is followed by cleaning, supporting and the providing of the infrastructure to the stope faces.
The provision of infrastructure includes the maintenance and managing of:
• in stope water and air services that is necessary for the drilling and dust allaying process
• travelling ways to and from the stope necessary for creating access ways for people and material
• scatter walls to contain the blast rock in a conveniently concentrated muck pile for the cleaning crew,
• material and people handling appliances including monorail, mono rope and chairlift devises
• double drum winches and scraper scoops for the moving of blasted rock
• pumping and pump installations to ensure sufficient water pressure and or clear out the accumulation of excess water from low lying areas.
• rail tracks for the locomotives and trains that transports workers, material and broken rock pover long horizontal distances underground.
• Safety devices that include tips and grizzlies to prevent inadvertent access of people down these near vertical excavations.
• Blasting equipment that includes remote blasting system cables and ventilation sensor equipment in the intake and return air passages.
• Ventilation systems that consists of various sizes of columns, temporary and permanent ventilation brattices, -walls, -holings and fans.
• Electricity and electric equipment required for the use during the mining process.
With reference to figure 1 a three dimensional mining layout of a typical gold mine can be viewed here. The figuredepicts the basic components, in three dimensions, used to explain the mining layout of a typical gold mine.
The broken ore is typically scraped on dip, down a 30 meter stope face into a strike gully, by means of a double drum winch and scraper scoop once it is blasted from the country rock.
Another double drum winch and scraper scoop is used to scrape the broken rock on strike to an orepass or boxhole, situated in the original raise. This boxhole can be situated up to 90 meters from the face where the blasting took place. The broken rock now cascades down this steeply inclined excavation (boxhole or orepass) to a crosscut on a lower level.
In the crosscut a train, normally with ten eight ton hoppers are used to transport the broken rock to the shaft. The shaft can be kilometres away from the point of mining. At the shaft the train tips it's cargo down the shaft orepass system, where it again cascades down to the shaft loading station near the bottom of the shaft. The broken rock are hoisted up a 2000 meter vertical shaft in rock skips with a typical capacity of 12 tons by means of a rock hoist to surface, in the case of a surface shaft, or to just above the loading station of the surface shaft in the case of a sub – shaft.
On surface the broken ore is transported to the metallurgy plant by means of a conveyor belt. In the metallurgy plant the ore is milled, screened, and chemically treated in order to allow separation of the gold from the gold bearing ore. The slime residue is pumped to a tailing dam and the gold concentrate is further treated. The gold concentrate is smelted and the 89% pure gold is poured into gold bars weighing about 31 kilograms each.
These gold bars are then transported to a Refinery where the silver is removed and the gold refined to 99.99% purity. It is this pure gold that is sold on the world gold markets.
© 2009 Carl Marx


